|
Our Casework
services are available in England,
Wales, and Scotland. »
Try our case quiz, just for fun>>
Our experience as expert witnesses >>
Comment on the case of Sean Hodgson >>
The
easy way for you to make an enquiry about
new casework »
|
The Forensic Institute provides specialist forensic
scientific and medical
expert witness services, and training in civil
or criminal investigations and legal proceedings.
In addition to our core scientific staff based
in Glasgow, an extensive network of experts and expert witnesses provide
the continually expanding knowledge upon which The Institute
is founded.
Our aims are to;
From our challenges to the use of the Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA technique in the Omagh Bomb trial [R v Hoey] to successful shaken baby cases, we believe that the purpose of the defence expert is to identify any credible challenge to the evidence of the Crown.
Professor Allan Jamieson, one of our DNA experts, was instrumental in the
challenges to the use of the LCN DNA
technique in the Omagh Bomb trial [R v Hoey] and
in the English Appeal Court case of Reed. He has consistently challenged the abuse of the technique
in Court.
Professor Jamieson is also the Co-editor in Chief of Wileys
Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences - a five
volume work.

"This encyclopaedia is astounding, running
to 3,100 pages with over 250 contributors, and
leaves, appropriately, no stone unturned or lacking
in forensic examination. ...
This is a hugely valuable and worthwhile
contribution to any civil or criminal practitioner’s
library."*
We welcome contact from potential clients, scientists,
and academics who may wish to make use of our services
or work with us to further our aims.
*Review
in the Journal of the Law Society of Scotland |
Letter to Nature from TFI on regulation of forensic science in UK>>
("a fresh, deeper and wider look at the use of low-template DNA techniques, particularly in casework, is overdue")
Response from the Forensic Regulator>>
Reforms planned for problems in DNA evidence? (April 2010) >>
("There has been a groundswell of concern among academics and criminal lawyers
about the quality of DNA evidence.")
LCN
controversy continues (March 2010) »
("It is a disappointment that tools to enable better interpretation have not kept pace with developments in forensic science over the past ten years")
So
DNA is objective? »
TFI response to the Law Commission on Expert Evidence (pdf) >>
TFI Response
to Regulator on accreditation (pdf) »
|